v. Gorrie, 43, iii.

Anglo-Austrian Printing Union, re
(71 L.T. 331), 20, 6, ii.
Argo, the, 51, vii.
Arms, goods of, 32, i.

Arrow Shipping Co. v. Tyne Im-
provement Commissioners, 56, vii.
Art Union of London v. Overseers of
Savoy (63 L.J. M.C. 253), 20,
17, vi.

Asten v. A. (L.R. [1894] 3 Ch. 260;
63 L.J. Ch. 834), 20, 29, ii.
A.-G. v. Camberwell Vestry, 59, ii.
v. Christ Church, 34, ix.
v. Jacobs-Smith, 54, i.
v. Worrall, 53, vii.
Australian Newspaper Co. v. Bennett
(63 L.J. P.C. 105), 19, 127, iii.

BAIRD V. MAYOR OF TUNBRIDGE WELLS
(L.R. [1894] 2 Q.B. 867), 20, 9, ii.
Bank of England, e. p.; re, S. Ameri-
can and Mexican Co., 41, i.
Bank of S. Australia, re, 38, i.
Bassett v. B., 49, v.

v. St. Levan, 60, iii.

Beardmore, e. p.; re Clark (63 L.J.

Q.B, 606), 19, 116, vi.

Beauclerk v. B., 42, iv,

Bedfordshire County Council, re,
45, ii.

Bell v. Earl of Dudley, 42, vi.
Bentley Breweries, e. p., 32, vi.
Bexley Railway Co., re (71 L.T. 533),
20, 11, vii

Black v. Clay (71 L.T. 446), 20,
11, iv.

Blazer Fire Lighter, re, 38, iii.
Blyth Harbour Commissioners v.
Newsham Churchwardens (63 L.J.
M.C. 274), 20, 17, vii.
Boake v. Stevenson, 50, vii.
Board of Trade, e. p. ; re Lamb (63
L.J. Q.B. 715), 19, 115, iii.
e. p.; re
Bolton & Co., re, 36, iii.
Bona, the, 56, ii.
Boyd v. Bischoffsheim, 49, iii.
Bradford (Mayor of) v. Pickles (71
L.T. 319), 20, 27, vi.

- 33, ii.

Brewery Assets Co., re (L.R. [1894]
3 Ch. 272; 71 L.T. 328; 43 W.R.
73), 20, 5, i.

Bridger v. Shaw, 31, iii.
Brierley v. B., 60, iv.

Briesemann, goods of (63 L.J. P. 159),
20, 29, vi.

Brinsden v. Williams (L.R. [1894],
3 Ch. 185), 20, 25, v.

Brooke v. B. (64 L.J. Ch. 21; 71
L.T. 398), 20, 2, i.

Brooman v. Withall, 61, v.
Browne, re, 45, v.

Bruno v. Eyston, 49, i.

Budgett v. B. (63 L.J. Ch. 847; 71

L.T. 411; 43 W.R. 51), 20, 20, iv.

Chamber Colliery Co. v. Rochdale
Canal Co. (63 L.J. Q.B. 811;
71 L.T. 535), 20, 4, i.
Chamberlain v. Springfield, 61, iv.
Chaplin v. Daly, 33, v.

Chapman v. Fylde Waterworks Co.
(64 L.J. Q.B. 15; 71 L.T. 539; 43
W.R. 1), 20, 16, i.

Chilton v. Progress Printing Co.,
39, iii.
China, &c., Bank V. American
Trading Co. (63 L.J. P.C. 92), 19,
121, iii.

Churchill v. St. George's Hospital,
61, ii.

Clements v. L. & N.W.R. (63 L.J. Q.B.

837), 20, 11, i.

Clergy Orphan Corporation, re, 34,
viii.

Cleveland Water Co. v. Redcar Local
Board, 45, iii.

Collingham v. Sloper, 49, iv.
Collins v. North British Investment
Co. (L.R. [1894] 3 Ch. 228), 20,
20, iii.

Collis v. Laugher (L.R. [1834] 3 Ch.
659; 63 L.J. Ch. 851; 43 W.R. 202),
20, 9, iii.

DANIELL'S SETTLED ESTATES, re, 55, i.
Darlaston Local Board v. L. and

N.W.R., 53, i.

Davies v. R. Bolton & Co., 35, vi.
Davis v. Foreman, 42, vii.

v. Martin (L.R. [1894] 3 Ch.
181; 63 L.J. Ch. 810), 20, 5, iv.
Daykin v. Parker (63 L.J. M.C. 246;
71 L.T. 379), 20, 12, ii.
Dayman v. D., 61, vii.
Debney v. Eckett, 60, i.
Dechéne v. City of Montreal, 35, iii.
Delhi Steamship Co., re, 38, ii.
Denver Hotel Co. v. Andrews, 54, v.
Derby (Mayor of) v. Grudgings (43
W.R. 74), 20, 13, iii.

Diana, the (L.R. [1894] A.C. 625),
20, 23, i.

Doncaster Assessment Committee v.
M. & S.L.R., 48, viii.
Drielsma v. Manifold (L.R. [1894]
3 Ch. 100), 20, 25, iv.
Dunster, e. p.; re Glory Paper Mills
Cc., 36, iv.

Dyer v. Tulley, 54, ii.

EARNSHAW-WALL, re (L.R. [1894]
3 Ch. 156; 63 L.J. Ch. 836), 20,
25, ii.

East London Waterworks Co. v.
Kyffin, 59, iii.

Ecclesiastical Commissioners v. Parr
(63 L.J. Q.B. 784), 20, 7, iv.
Eckersley v. Mersey Dock Board
(71 L.T. 308), 20, 2, iii.
Edwards v. E., 60, vii.
Ehrmann v. E., 48, ii.

Eliot v. Mayor of Bristol, 58, ii.
Elmsley v. Mitchell, 35, ii.
Englishman, the (63 L.J. P. 133;
43 W.R. 62), 20, 24, v.

FIGG V. MOORE (63 L.J. P. 709), 20,
2, vi.

Foden v. F. (L.R. [1894] P. 307;
63 L.J. P. 163), 20, 10, vii.
Forbes v. Hume, 60, vi.
Fordom v. Parsons, 45, i.
Fortescue v. Lestwithiel Railway
Co., 52, v.

Foster v. L.C. & D.R., 52, iv.
Franklin v. Godfrey, 59, v.
Freer v. Murray, 43, vii.
Frodingham Iron Co. v. Bowser,
41, vi.

V. Vaughan Sherrin
Electric Engineering Co., 37, iv.
Hanbury v. H. (L.R. [1894] P. 315),
19, 124, vi.

Hansen v. Harrold (63 L.J. Q.B. 744),
19, 103, iii.

Harrison v. Barney (L.R. [1894]
3 Ch. 562; 43 W.R. 105), 20, 26, v.
Hanfstaengl v. Empire Palace (L.R.
[1894] 3 Ch. 109), 20, 7, vi.
Herefordshire County Council

V.

Leominster Town Council, 44, ii.
Hewison v. Ricketts (63 L.J. Q.B.
711), 20, 7, i.
Hinchliffe, re, 45, iv.
Hirsche v. Sims, 35, iv.

Hoggan v. Esquimault Railway Co.

(63 L.J. P.C. 97), 20, 4, iii.
Highgate School v. Sewell (L.R.
[1894] 2 Q.B. 706; 63 L.J. Q.B.
320), 20, 11, vi.

Hollinrake v. Truswell (L.R. [1894]
3 Ch. 420; 71 L.T. 419), 20, 7, v.
Holmes v. Formesby, 46, v.
Hood-Barrs v. Cathcart (63 L.J.
Q.B. 798), 20, 14, iii.

V.

(L.R. [1894]
3 Ch. 376; 63 L.J. Ch. 793), 20,
14, vi.

V.

Ch. 897), 20, 25, vi.

(63 L.J.

e. p.; re Lumley, 45, vi.

Hough v. H., 42, ii.

Huffam v. North Staffordshire Rail-
way Co., 52, ii.

Hull Docks Co. v. Sculcoates Union
(63 L.J. M.C. 279), 19, 133, ii.

LAMBTON V. MELLISH, 48, i.
Laver v. Bootham, 48, vi.
Le Bas v. Herbert (L.R. [1894] 3 Ch.
250; 43 W.R. 190), 20, 1, i.
Lemmon v. Webb, 47, vii.
Liberator Building Society, re, 36, vi.
Lindsay v. Rook, 32, ii.
Lloyd v. Tardy, 61, i.

London & General Bank, re, 50, v.
L.C.C. v. Humphreys (43 W.R. 13),
20, 15, iii.

v. St. George's Assessment
Committee, 48, ix.

v. Worley, 46, vi.

London Street Tramways Company

v. L.C.C., 58, v.

Long v. Gardner, 49, ii.

Lovejoy v. Cole, 40, ii.

Lovell v. Beauchamp, 33, vii.
Lysaght v. Coleman, 56, iii.

MCILQUHAM V. TAYLOR, 39, i.

Main, the (L.R. [1894] P. 320), 19,
104, i.

Malam, v. Hitchens, 57, vii.

Malleson v. General Mineral Patents
Syndicate, 37, iii.

Maplin Sands, re, 50, vi.
Martindale, re, 38, vi.

Mason, e. p.; re Isaacson, 33, vi.
Maund, e. p., 33, x.

May v. Lane, 32, v.

Mecca, the, 55, vii.

Mellin v. White, 42, viii.
Meunier, re (71 L.T. 403), 20, 10,
ii.

Meyrick v. A. G. (L.R. [1894] 3 Ch.
209), 20, 13, iii.`

Midland Coal Co., re Craig's Case,
37, ii.

Mills v. Johnston (L.R. [1894] 3
Ch. 204; 63 L.J. Ch. 753; 71 L.T.
392), 20, 28, vi.
Minnie, the, 56, v.
Mohideen Hadjiar v. Pitchey (63
L.J. P.C. 90), 20, 9, v.
Minter v. Carr (L.R. [1894] 3 Ch.
498; 71 L.T. 526), 20, 15, v.
Mona, the (L.R. [1894] P. 265; 63
L.J. P. 94; 43 W.R. 173), 20,
23, ii.

Montforts v. Marsden, 57, iv.
Morgan v. Hill (71 L.T. 327), 20,
26, ii.

57, vi.

NATIONAL DWELLINGS Co. v. SYKES
(L.R. [1894] 3 Ch. 159; 63 L.J.
Ch. 906), 20, 5, iii.

Provincial Bank and Marsh,

re, 58, vii.

Folding Box, &c., Co. v. N.
Folding Box Co., 58, iv.

Starch Co. V. Munn's
Maizena Co. (63 L.J. P.C. 112), 19,
143, iv.

Negus, re, 57, i.

Neptune Steam Navigation Co. v.
Sclater, 55, vi.

Neville v. Matthewman (L.R. [1894]
3 Ch. 345; 63 L.J. Ch. 734), 20,
20, i.

New v. Burns, 50, iii.

Newby v. Sims (63 L.J. M.C. 228),
19, 70, vi.

New Zealand Loan Co., re, 38, iv.
Newen v. Barnes (63 L.J. Ch. 763;
43 W.R. 58), 19, 139, v.

Nordenfeldt, re, 34, ii.

v. Maxim-Nordenfeldt

Guns, &c., Co., 53, vi.
Norton v. Counties Building Society,
32, iv.

Nottingham County Council v. M.S.
and L.R., 41, v.

Nutter v. Holland, 50, ix.

Noyes v. Paterson (L.R. [1894]
3 Ch. 267; 63 L.J. Ch. 748), 20,
27, ii.

OLIVER V. ROBINS, 39, v.; 49, vi.
Orienta, the, 56, iv.

Owen, re (L.R. [1894] 3 Ch. 220;
63 L.J. Ch. 749; 43 W.R. 55),
20, 12, v.

PAINTER, e. p.; re P., 33, ix.
Parker v. Young, 34, i.

Patten v. West of England Iron, &c.,
Co. (63 L.J. Q.B. 757), 19, 114, ii.
Peake's Settled Estates, re, 54, vi.
Peek v. Ray, 50, i.

Pharmaceutical Society v. Armson
(64 L.J. Q.B. 32; 71 L.T. 315),
20, 17, iii.

Pilbrow v. Shoreditch Vestry, 46, ii.
Pledge v. Carr, 47, v.

Plomley v. Richardson, 35, v.
Portsea Island Building Society v.

Barclay (63 L.J. Ch. 837), 20, 3, vi.
Powell v. Birmingham Vinegar Co.,
58, iii.
Printing Telegraph Co, v. Drucker
(L.R. [1894] 2 Q.B. 801; 64 L.J.
Q.B. 58), 20, 19, i.

Preston Banking Co. v. Alsop, 50,

viii.

Robinson v. Geisel (64 L.J. Q.B. 52),
20, 19, vii.

v. Lynes (63 L.J. Q.B. 759;
43 W.R. 62), 20, 14, iv.

v. Shaw (63 L.J. Ch. 770;

43 W.R. 3), 20, 14, ii.
Rochdale Canal Co. v. Brewster

(L.R. [1894] 2 Q.B. 852; 64 L.J.
Q,B. 37), 20, 17, v.

Rogers v. Harding (L.R. [1894] 3
Ch. 315), 20, 18, i.

Roscoe v. Boden (63 L.J. Q.B. 767),
19, 88, iv.

Rose v. Bank of Australasia (L.R.
[1894] A.C. 687), 19, 141, iii.
Ross v. White (L.R. [1894] 3 Ch.
326; 64 L.J. Ch. 48), 20, 16, iii.
Rouse v. Bradford Bank, 48, iii.
Royal Bank of Scotland v. Totten-
ham (43 W.R. 22), 20, 4, ii.
Rymer v. Stanfield, 60, ii.

ST. MARTIN'S VESTRY V. BIRD, 46, iii.
St. Peter's Vicar v. Parishioners,
40, vii.

Sanders, e.p.; re S. (63 L.J. Q.B. 734),
20, 3, i.

Sanguinetti v. Stuckey's Bank, 34, iii.
Saunders V. Holborn Board of
Works, 46, iv.

Schreiber v. Heyman, 49, viii.
Scobie v. Collins, 47, iv.
Scott v. Bould, 47, iii.

Securities Insurance Co., re (63
L.J. Ch. 770), 19, 134, vi.
Semet's Patent, re, 48, v.
Sewers, Commissioners of, v. Vicar
of St. Botolph, 38, v.
Shenstone v. Hilton (71 L.T. 339),
20, 10, iii.

Sinclair v. James, 51, i.

Sir T. Salt's Application, re (L.R.
[1894] 3 Ch. 265; 63 L.J. Ch. 756),
20, 26, iv.

Sirdar Gwrdyal Singh v. Rajah of
Faridkote, 43, i.

Skelton v. Wood, 52, i.

Skinner v. Perry (63 L.J. Ch. 826),
20, 17, i.

Sleet, e. p.; re S., 33, iv.
Smith v. Lancaster, 54, vii.
Smurthwaite v. Hannay

(L.R.

[1894] A.C. 494; 63 L.J. Q.B. 737;
43 W.R. 113), 20, 19, vi.
Snaith v. S. (71 L.T. 318), 20, 29, iv.
Somerset v. Land Securities Co.,
37, i.

Southampton (Sheriff of), e. p. (63
L.J. Q.B. 756), 20, 22, iv.
Starkey v. Eyres, 60, v.

TARBUCK, e. p., 34, v.

Tasker v. T., 42, iii.
Taylor v. M.S. & L.R., 40, i.
Teresa, the, 55, viii.

Theta, the (L.R. [1894] P. 281; 63
L.J. P. 160), 20, 23, iii.
Thomasset v. T. (L.R. [1894] P. 295;
63 L.J. P. 140), 20, 10, v.
Thorne v. Cann, 47, vi.
Thorne-George v. Godfrey (63 L.J.

Ch. 854; 71 L.T. 568), 20, 14, vii.
Treadgold V. Town Clerk of
Grantham, 53, iv.

Truman, Hanbury, Buxton & Co.
v. Karslake, 44, vi.

Trustee, e. p.; re Marsh, 33, iii.
Tucker v. T., 58, vi.

Tullett v. Colville, 61, vi.
Turner v. Spencer, 44, i.

Tuticorin Cotton Press Co., re,
36, i.

Tyrell v. Painton, 50, ii.